Thursday, December 17, 2009
New Website
Wednesday, December 9, 2009
It's refelection time!
My journey into the technological realm of history is not complete so I feel it would be premature to make some final assessments of my development. Next semester I will be engaging in an interactive exhibit design course which again will marry technological processes with historical initiatives. This first inculcation to the digital humanities has gotten me very excited about this next chapter in my development. I have learned about tools which I thought only existed in science fiction, or at the very least, possessed by the military in total secrecy. Perhaps the greatest lesson learned by anyone over time of their life is to never doubt one’s own capabilities and to always keep and open mind to new experiences. As a self professed primitivism, technology and me seemed like two positively charged ions on a collision course bent for instant and total repulsion from each other. However I find myself energized by what I have learned over the past four months. Rather than being scared of technology, well I think actually I am still a little scared to be honest. Rather than being consumed by fear, I now see that there can be a harmony between past, present and future. Are we in the process of a major change in the very nature of human existence, I would say yes. Does that mean we as humans have to fear such a large development? My answer before this class would almost assuredly been yes. Even though I understand how large scale evolutional technological initiatives have almost always improved the human experience, I would have still talked as though the world was transforming in ways that would hamper the human experience. But now, I see things not necessarily in a more positive light, but certainly in a much more balanced way. Will the Internet and digital technology change humanity for the better or worse. The answer is both! After learning about the new kinds of technology on the forefront for humanists and the general society at large, I can say that the future is here. Overall, humans will continue to live and our lives will change due to currents now unstoppable in their momentum. However, this is not a bad thing. Talk to a version of me four months ago and I would not have even contemplated these answers to such a daunting question! The journey has been started, I’ll report back in another four months when I’m a little farther down the road.
Monday, December 7, 2009
Clausewitz: What data mining can reveal!
renewal of the era of warfare be a change for the ONLY A CONTINUATION OF STATE POLICY BY OTHER MEANS . This always be the aim of Warfare . Now War is always therefore , will action in warfare be stopped , as indeed it is called forth by policy it would step into the step into the place of policy , and as something quite a want of harmony between policy and the conduct of a prior right to consideration . Policy , therefore , is interwoven IS A MERE CONTINUATION OF POLICY BY OTHER MEANS . We the tendencies and views of policy shall not be incompatible with if we regard the State policy as the intelligence of the only if we understand by policy not a true appreciation of War may belong more to policy than the first . 27 object of particular acts of Warfare , and therefore also the an intimate knowledge of State policy in its higher relations . of the War and the policy of the State here coincide at the different scenes of Warfare , or to send there is still more like State policy , which again , on scale . Besides , State policy is the womb in which end of the act of warfare , and modify or influence at the present state of warfare , we should say that displays itself most in mountain warfare , where every one down lie towards the province of policy . The preparations for a SUSPENSION OF THE ACT IN WARFARE IF one considers War as suspension in the act of Warfare , strictly speaking , is Nevertheless in this kind of Warfare , there is also a which , with a shilly-shally policy , and a routine-ridden military as the real activity in Warfare , which , by its are cases also in modern Warfare in which this has not
Like all good historians, I know that the hardest and most crucial part of our inquiry is asking the right questions. In terms of text mining, I simply do not know the questions to ask in order to find out the information I desire. Luckily for me, the TAPoR software which I used for my text mining offers a great 'recipe guide' to finding useful information through text mining. I decided to try the recipe for Exploring Themes Withing a Text since I have been searching for Clausewitz's theory. At first I had to generate a word search using words related to the theme I was searching for. This is certainly an area where I am not very comfortable. Word associations remind me of grade 12 English, not historical research. But herein lies the challenges of this new type of interpretation, forcing us to think outside of our comfort zone. With enough practice, historians could be forging new links between themes and theories using these novel digital tools. For Clausewitz and the theme of nationalism engendered by policy and warfare, I chose to enter only four words: warfare, policy, nationalism, superiority. Next I had to determine the senses of the words. Again, deja vu of grade 12 English. After determining the senses I then had to find synonyms and antonyms of my chosen words. There were no synonyms or antonyms for any of my words. Using all my words, I then used the concordance tool to find all the instances of use for each word. I came up with a very similar result as my first concordance test. I then needed to finish the recipe doing a collocates search. Unfortunately, my words came up with no result.
Overall, I can definitely see how useful text mining can be for historians and scholars. However, I simply do not know the right questions to ask to uncover any meaningful information for new interpretations. I started on this quest hoping to find something new about On War. I did not learn anything new about the text,but I did learn something about how I have interpreted it. Perhaps I should have expanded my initial observations on the books themes and not focused on such a narrow aspect. Perhaps the best lesson that I learned was the difference between Human language and Machine language. If we are going to harness the power of computers to advance scholarly research in the humanities, we had better learn how to speak effectively with them. The biggest obstacle that I ran into was asking the right questions of the software. I needed to be more descriptive in my word selections and better attuned to the use of language in On War. The real skill of text mining is knowing what the computer requires in terms of information to produce the results you want. In my first attempt, I was way off! The computer and I were speaking a different language. The next step for historians is to figure out how to ask the right questions of computers. We have gotten pretty good at questioning humans, now its time to face a new challenge.
I was able to perform text mining of this book with the help of TAPoR. This website has a text analysis portal that can be accessed by scholars and students with great ease. The site is easy to use and has a wonderful tutorial to help all new users. I used the Gutenberg Project to extract the text for On War. This digitization initiative contains over 30 000 e-books for free download and use and continues to add to its extensive collection.
Tuesday, November 24, 2009
Abundance Abounds!
Monday, November 16, 2009
The books from Christmas Past
Monday, November 9, 2009
It's about time I blogged about blogging
As a deep believer in the positive power of reflective introspection, I feel it is time for me to look back on my evolution as a blogger over the past two months. What I have gotten out of blogging? Is this what I expected blogging to be like? What will my future blogging look like after this initial feeling out process? I was never one to keep journals or a diary but was always aware of the power of introspection. Always scrolling through thoughts, ideas, fears and dreams in my memory rolodex kept me in tune with my ever evolving self. Can blogging allow me to achieve similar results for my professional self? How can I use blogging to further my passion in history and gets others involved as well? Here is what I have learned so far...
As someone who never cared to write a diary, use journals or even a calendar for organization, I am finding this type of personal outlet enjoyable. I think that the potential possibility for communication is the straw that stirs my drink when it comes to blogging. A journal is meant for one person only, the author and the author only. A blog is different in the fact that it can be a personal journal meant to be viewed by anybody patrolling on the internet. I love the idea that I can talk about anything of interest to me at a particular point in time on my blog and someone interested in the same thing can find me. It's this communicative potential which is the real power of blogging. Historians especially should be harnessing this capability to engage in dialog not only between themselves but to the public as well. Too often historians perch in the ivory tower unwilling to engage in constructive dialog about their passions. But what good is a passion that is left unshared with people? This does not include the few dozen academics worldwide who may have read your latest publication, or couple hundred for the successful ones. I'm talking about engaging with lots of people about something that inspires us: History! Blogging is not a collective production, we still control the ideas and words of our blogs. However, blogging allows others to get into our brains without the constraints of language, form and content which are inherent in almost all scholarly publications. So relax everybody, the warm world of blogging is within our comfort zone of academic production, we just need to harness it!
One thing that I really enjoy about blogging is the many forms it can take on. You can structure a blog anyway you want to discuss any topic you want. The freedom is astounding! Some bloggers prefer a very rigid focus that defines their blog. This blog is written to discuss x ideas on y subject. These blogs are great for content since they have defined parameters and all blogs are streamlined to fit within the overarching focus of the author. They are usually easier to find (another benefit) and can generate excellent discussions as people reading the blog will no doubt be passionate about the same particular subject. Conversely, you can blog about nothing in particular at all and everything all at once. You can blog about what you are thinking at a particular time, the great time you had last night or even about a really cool blog that you just came across. The possibilities are endless! These blogs are great for a lark, entertainment and also can be very elucidating about human nature (due to the spontaneous nature of this kind of blogging). I believe that I am somewhere in the middle of this dichotomy. I like to talk about historical things, but anything relating to history can be game for my blog. Already I have blogged about Holocaust Denial, Canadian National Identity and The Mongol Empire! Something biblical is probably coming too since I find the bible as a historical source to be extraordinarily fascinating. I even find myself blogging about entirely different ideas within a blog then I maybe started with (this blog no doubt will be the same I am sure of it!). For historians, this gives us a myriad of potential ways to structure a blog. We can blog about one thing in history or many things. We can have an academic tone or a casual one, or both. I say it's time for us to have our cake and eat it too! And while we are eating cake, let's share it with everyone as well.
The one real hiccup when it comes to blogging is getting people to read it. In the new age of the long tail, how can one stand out from the crowd? First things first, make sure your blog is good, no one wants to read a bad blog. Next it's time to start deploying a few tricks of the trade. Having learnt a few of these tricks from my Digital History Professor Bill Turkel (nice name drop, I’ll tell you why in a little!) about how search engines work, we historians can easily make them work for us. Using efficient keyword in your titles, linking sites with other historians (hence the name drop) and generating word of mouth buzz are all great ways to make your site show up where it counts. Historians have a head start in some respects since we have built in audiences ready to be tapped. There is such a public thirst for history that all we need to do is go out quench it. The internet allows us a communicative potential that far exceeds all the capabilities of reaching a physical audience. If historians are looking to get their ideas out there, the internet is only the most vast reaching social communication system ever conceived by man. Shouldn't this be the first place to go?
Sunday, November 1, 2009
Genghis Khan - Now available in web 2.0

For me, there is no single individual who captures the imagination of what can be achieved in one's lifetime more than the founder of the Mongol Empire Temujin, or as most of us know him Genghis Khan. Depending on what source you may read, he is either one of the greatest political and military leaders in history or the most successful of a long line of savage nomadic warlords who contributed nothing to the world expect despoliation and destruction. Having read countless books and articles on him, I have definitely formed my own opinion, but where and what can a novice on the subject access in terms of information on the internet about Temujin? Since we have been studying folksonomies I thought I would digress from my usual first point of destination 'google' and try the user generated delicious.com to search for content on Temujin.